All News
March 16, 2012
The Arts Research Center at UC Berkeley is sponsoring the symposium “ART/CITY” on March 16, 2012.
This effort you are spearheading is one that is very important and, as we see in Berkeley to date, a real change agent. First: PARKING. PARKING. PARKING. I have taken classes at the Crucible, Albany Adult School, Richmond Art Center and exhibited at Richmond Art Center. All have ample free parking. On the rare occasions I decide to go to Zellerbach, PARKING is my first and main concern. It is easier for me to go to SF on BART than to the UCB art gallery on Bancroft. I only live at Spruce and Eunice (approximately), but am 70 and will not walk the distance and certainly not at night w
As an artist whose work primarily consists of engaging people in participatory collaborative events, how can I best use public places in my work? One form my work takes is engaging the public in collaboratively creating ephemeral sculpture using natural materials. I’ve carried out many local public events in a diversity of settings: in Berkeley parks, on pavement (street festivals), on private property bordering sidewalks, and even on the lawn in front of Berkeley’s Old City Hall.
What is the role of the university in a city? Are we, as an institution, cultural producers providing the city with content such as exhibitions, lectures, or public projects? Are we organizers, facilitators or interpreters of civic life? Or is our primary role to train students to be cultural practitioners that can either act as cultural workers in our city or elsewhere? This last question can often become a significant choice between encouraging students to stay and act locally within Dallas or to travel to major global cultural centers such as New York, Los Angeles, London or Berlin.
The Arts Research Center at UC Berkeley is sponsoring the symposium “ART/CITY” on March 16, 2012.
February 23, 2012
In a recent conversation with a performance scholar whom I respect deeply, the issue of re-performance, or as it is also often referred to re-enactment (the distinction between these two terms being another topic ripe for conversation), was brought up only to be quickly written off as kitsch and as a sign of a lack of any new platforms for performance production, signaling a sort of dead end in performance’s political efficacy. I was troubled by the shutdown of conversation and what seemed like a full-scale dismissal of any work produced within the matrix of re-performance.
February 22, 2012
We (Laurie Beth Clarkand Michael Peterson) are artists and scholars who make work independently and collaboratively.
1) My work was never organized by a commitment to a disciplinary framework. I can talk at length about disciplinary formations, however. Like – what cultural studies enables for literary scholars – the disinterest many literary scholars have in a reified notion of “the literary,” our sense of happiness in jettisoning the canon, our glee in the discovery that unloading that dead discursive weight didn’t require abandoning our fondness for the formal, the textual. We swapped literature for text somewhere in the mid 1980s.
Out of the six exhibitions my students curated since I began heading the Museum and Curatorial Studies program at Cal State Long Beach, two have taken the issue of exhibiting performance as their primary concern. In 2008 Un-figuring the Body (lead by Megan Hoetger) investigated the posthumous representation of performance-related objects in the gallery space, tackling the problem of how to represent the (intensely) physical work of performance after the event took place, and the theoretical implication of how the human body becomes “figured” in representation.
Several issues emerged from my work on Allan Kaprow and happenings and have been taking up headroom for some time now.
1) “Strips of behavior” and the repertoire and how these two concepts do or don’t map onto advanced art practice.
2) Deskilling and its self-conscious institutionalizing as “resistant” practice.
3) Institutional critique as necessary decoy.
4) The fetishizing of collective and/or participatory practice v. the problematics of solo work.
I have been mulling the historical and political contexts and consequence of our present fixation with “participation” — as the art world calls it — or “participatory culture” as it is referred to in media and cultural studies. In a well-known essay, Claire Bishop teased out one key assumption: that between participation and democracy. Indeed, participatory democracy, a cherished value of the new left, has received renewed attention due to its presence within the Occupy movement.
- « first Full listing: News
- ‹ previous Full listing: News
- …
- 23 of 32 Full listing: News
- 24 of 32 Full listing: News
- 25 of 32 Full listing: News
- 26 of 32 Full listing: News
- 27 of 32 Full listing: News (Current page)
- 28 of 32 Full listing: News
- 29 of 32 Full listing: News
- 30 of 32 Full listing: News
- 31 of 32 Full listing: News
- next › Full listing: News
- last » Full listing: News